Limewire Lawsuit
From LoveToKnow Music
The battle between the record industry and online file sharing groups continues in the form of the ongoing Limewire lawsuit. Limewire, a popular P2P file sharing network, is being sued for millions by record labels who charge that Limewire’s executives are committing copyright infringement by providing the software which allows people to swap songs online. Limewire replies that they merely provide the software and are not responsible for the way people use it. This court case has long reaching implications for music fans that use the internet to share music and software developers who are creating software that has a number of applications, some of which enter legally uncharted territory.
Limewire Lawsuit - The Basics
First, a basic run down of the players in the Limewire Lawsuit. The suit is officially called Arista versus Limewire, but other labels, like Sony BMG and Virgin are named as plaintiffs in the case. The labels are seeking compensatory damages as well as punitive damages against the Limewire Corporation of at least $150,000 per song traded using Limewire’s software. The case was filed in a District of New York court in August, 2006. Additional labels have until January 31, 2007, to join the case against Limewire. As yet, there is no date scheduled to hear the case, though a list of expert witnesses must be submitted to the court by May 16, 2007, and all depositions are due into the court by July 13, 2007.
Limewire has filed a countersuit against the record labels, alleging that the labels resorted to illegal business practices to intimidate potential Limewire customers.
What’s It Really All About?
The Limewire lawsuit is one in a long line of cases brought by record labels and the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) have brought against everyone from software manufacturers to music playing device manufacturers to private citizens who use these products. Record labels are downright terrified that new technology will rob them of their profits by allowing users to distribute songs as many times as they like, free of charge. The music industry managed to bring down the original free file sharing program, Napster, and forced them to change their business model so that the labels profited from songs distributed by Napster. Other companies like Bearshare, WinMX, and most recently, Kazaa, have followed suit, either folding or clamping down on the sharing of copyright protected files.
The recording industry also has managed to force Microsoft and Apple to pay a percentage of the profit from each sale of the Microsoft Zune and iPod to a music industry kitty, to be distributed among the major labels. MP3 Players are considered by many in the industry to be nothing more than “a vessel for stolen music” so MP3 manufacturers who do not pay a portion of their profits to the record industry often become targets of costly lawsuits by the recording industry.
Who’s Right?
Well, that’s a matter of perspective. We’ve been here before, though. When home recordable cassettes first become available, the recording industry panicked, and shouted from the roof tops that “home taping kills music.” Eventually, a deal was worked out between cassette manufacturers and the industry that a penny from each blank cassette sold would go into the industry pot. Sound familiar? Ditto when recordable CD-Rs became available. The major labels are hard at work developing CDs that will only play in your player, downloads that can only be listened to X number of times and so on.
But is Limewire, and companies like them, stealing profits from record companies, as alleged in the Limewire lawsuit? Record company profits are down, to be sure. How much of that is due to file sharing and how much of that is due to a decrease in the quality of the music being offered by labels is open to debate. A UNC/Harvard University study found that the effect of file sharing on music sales was exactly zero. Many music fans say they are more than willing to pay their favorite bands for the music they create, but they’re sick of buying albums with one hit song and 20 filler songs. The real question here might be for the major record labels to take a look at their business models and ask themselves if throwing a bunch of money at an artist with one song for a big wave of exposure that goes bust in month is more important than long term artist development.
Also interesting to note is that major labels, not indie labels, are suffering profit losses and suing the Limewires of the world. And only major labels, not indie labels, share in the profits from sales of MP3 players, blank cassettes, and CD-Rs.
What Do You Think?
Share your thoughts on the Limewire lawsuit by leaving us a comment at the bottom of the page. Stay tuned to LTK Music for all of the latest Limewire lawsuit developments.
Learn More
Comments
I beleive that those that reproduce records to resell them should be prosecuted but people that just like to listen to music for personal use... what's wrong with that? If I buy the cd and like to share my music in fact is helping because I might just make someone buy the original. There is nothing wrong with sharing but if you are making money with this website is a whole other story.
-- Contributed by: fairyskidsSorry, Mary - the labels HAVE sued. And sometimes successfully. However, the point remains that downloading could have an effect on much more than just the artists.
Ask many indie artists and labels why they are not suing, and you'll find it is a matter of principle for them. Most studies have found that P2P file sharing has not impacted music sales - that there are many other reasons for falling sales. For indies, people creating buzz about their artists is a good thing.
It is a very complicated subject, definitely.
-- Contributed by: HlmcdonaWhatever dude, screw them, they only care about money and that's it. Music these days sucks anyway just a piece of crap. I couldn't give a flying f*** about the big labels, I'd rather buy from the humble ones, of course until they get greedy and disgusting as the "big" ones.
-- Contributed by: F'uck'em
This page has been accessed 13,812 times. This page was last modified 00:12, 28 November 2009.
© 2006-2010 LoveToKnow Corp.
Subscribe with RSS
See all RSS feeds
Visit us on facebook